'The Debate of the Existence of God'

'Abstract\nThis news report explores the origin amid a prof whos an un believer and his disciple whos a Christian. An name was post by Patricia Bridewell on her website (www.patrish.com) move to her by Phil Mathews. Phil Mathews was non the occasion of the verbalise article. There willing be ternary exposit provided reenforcement the conclusion of the Christian student. The author thusly concluded that the line of business is inductive leaders to some of the fallacies found. The author found 4 (four) logical fallacies deport on some(prenominal) side of the financial statement: (1) Loaded Questions, (2) entreaty to Authority, (3) Appeal to Ignorance, (4) Ad Hominem-Abusive. This paper then, gave go forth reasons, mainly accord to the article, that faith on something that one cannot be proven by accomplishment is a way to believe that something really does exist. The author, then, gave verboten reasons why the argument of both sides be weak.\n\nKeywords: ad ho minem, inductive, forfeitthinker\n\nDoes deity very Exist?\nIn the article, The Atheist: prof vs the Christian Student, posted on Patricia Bridewells blogspot www.patrish.com), wherein an Atheist prof and a Christian student conclude whether or not graven image does exist, in that location came 3 (three) innovates: (Premise 1): The Christian student claimed that the professor is workings on the premise of wave-particle duality. The professor sees God as something he can placard through grown out duality; a grave God and a bad God. When, science cant even amply understand the things they custom to measure things. (Premise 2): The Christian student claimed that God, consort to the Bible, is letting bad things happen, to tell if great deal can take up good or evil by their own free will. (Premise 3): Finally, the student claimed that if God is non-existent consort to the phoebe bird senses, then, the professors brain, in which the quintuple senses cannot prove exist s, is non-existent as well. The conclusion would be, according to the argument do by the professor and the Christian s... '